{"id":16046,"date":"2026-08-17T13:23:38","date_gmt":"2026-08-17T11:23:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png"},"modified":"2026-08-17T13:23:38","modified_gmt":"2026-08-17T11:23:38","slug":"prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2","status":"inherit","type":"attachment","link":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation"},"author":358,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-16046","attachment","type-attachment","status-inherit","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation - PRIF BLOG<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation - PRIF BLOG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Contempt is the strongest emotional predictor of rejecting negotiation. When all four emotions were considered together, only contempt remained statistically significant (author\u2019s own compilation). Note: Standardised coefficients from a linear regression model predicting a reliable three-item scale of moral rejection of negotiation (\u03b1 = .925). N = 236; R\u00b2 = .145. Contempt was the only statistically significant emotional predictor (p = .002).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"PRIF BLOG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/HSFK.PRIF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1131\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"669\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@HSFK_PRIF\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Elias Ott\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17\\\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\\\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17\\\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\\\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation - PRIF BLOG\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-17T11:23:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17\\\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\\\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17\\\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\\\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17\\\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\\\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Conflict Endures: Venezuela after the Intervention\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17\\\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"PRIF BLOG\",\"description\":\"Peace Research Institute Frankfurt \\\/ Leibniz Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Peace Research Institute Frankfurt \\\/ Leibniz Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/cropped-blog_rgb.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/cropped-blog_rgb.png\",\"width\":750,\"height\":226,\"caption\":\"Peace Research Institute Frankfurt \\\/ Leibniz Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.prif.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/HSFK.PRIF\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/HSFK_PRIF\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/8912786\\\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation - PRIF BLOG","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation - PRIF BLOG","og_description":"Contempt is the strongest emotional predictor of rejecting negotiation. When all four emotions were considered together, only contempt remained statistically significant (author\u2019s own compilation). Note: Standardised coefficients from a linear regression model predicting a reliable three-item scale of moral rejection of negotiation (\u03b1 = .925). N = 236; R\u00b2 = .145. Contempt was the only statistically significant emotional predictor (p = .002).","og_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/","og_site_name":"PRIF BLOG","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/HSFK.PRIF","og_image":[{"width":1131,"height":669,"url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@HSFK_PRIF","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Elias Ott"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/","url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/","name":"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation - PRIF BLOG","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-08-17T11:23:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/prif-spotlight-12_26_grafik-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Conflict Endures: Venezuela after the Intervention","item":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/2026\/08\/17\/the-conflict-endures-venezuela-after-the-intervention\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Emotional Predictors of Moral Rejection and Negotiation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/","name":"PRIF BLOG","description":"Peace Research Institute Frankfurt \/ Leibniz Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/#organization","name":"Peace Research Institute Frankfurt \/ Leibniz Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung","url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-blog_rgb.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-blog_rgb.png","width":750,"height":226,"caption":"Peace Research Institute Frankfurt \/ Leibniz Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/HSFK.PRIF","https:\/\/x.com\/HSFK_PRIF","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/8912786\/"]}]}},"description":{"rendered":"<p class=\"attachment\"><a href='https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png'><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"177\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-300x177.png\" class=\"attachment-medium size-medium\" alt=\"The bar chart is based on a multiple linear regression with a sample size of 236. Under the heading \u201cEmotional Predictors of Moral Rejection of Negotiation,\u201d there are four bars, each labeled on the Y-axis as \u201cContempt,\u201d \u201cDistrust,\u201d \u201cFear,\u201d and \u201cAnger.\u201d The Y-axis, labeled \u201cStandardized coefficient (\u03b2),\u201d ranges from -0.2 to 0.3. The \u201cContempt\u201d bar is the most pronounced, with \u03b2 = .279 and a significance level (p) of .002. The \u201cDistrust\u201d bar is the only one that extends into the negative range, with values of \u03b2 = -.078 and p = .359. The \u201cFear\u201d bar is the second most pronounced, with values of \u03b2 = .133 and p = .093. The last bar, \u201cAnger,\u201d has values of \u03b2 = .086 and p = .363.\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-300x177.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-1024x606.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-768x454.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png 1131w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n"},"caption":{"rendered":"<p>Contempt is the strongest emotional predictor of rejecting negotiation. When all four emotions were considered together, only contempt remained statistically significant (author\u2019s own compilation).<br \/>\nNote: Standardised coefficients from a linear regression model predicting a reliable three-item scale of moral rejection of negotiation (\u03b1 = .925). N = 236; R\u00b2 = .145. Contempt was the only statistically significant emotional predictor (p = .002).<\/p>\n"},"alt_text":"The bar chart is based on a multiple linear regression with a sample size of 236. Under the heading \u201cEmotional Predictors of Moral Rejection of Negotiation,\u201d there are four bars, each labeled on the Y-axis as \u201cContempt,\u201d \u201cDistrust,\u201d \u201cFear,\u201d and \u201cAnger.\u201d The Y-axis, labeled \u201cStandardized coefficient (\u03b2),\u201d ranges from -0.2 to 0.3. The \u201cContempt\u201d bar is the most pronounced, with \u03b2 = .279 and a significance level (p) of .002. The \u201cDistrust\u201d bar is the only one that extends into the negative range, with values of \u03b2 = -.078 and p = .359. The \u201cFear\u201d bar is the second most pronounced, with values of \u03b2 = .133 and p = .093. The last bar, \u201cAnger,\u201d has values of \u03b2 = .086 and p = .363.","media_type":"image","mime_type":"image\/png","media_details":{"width":1131,"height":669,"file":"2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png","filesize":35582,"sizes":{"medium":{"file":"PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-300x177.png","width":300,"height":177,"filesize":3575,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-300x177.png"},"large":{"file":"PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-1024x606.png","width":1024,"height":606,"filesize":52380,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-1024x606.png"},"thumbnail":{"file":"PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"filesize":2257,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-150x150.png"},"medium_large":{"file":"PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-768x454.png","width":768,"height":454,"filesize":34914,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik-768x454.png"},"full":{"file":"PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png","width":1131,"height":669,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0","keywords":[],"alt":""}},"post":16044,"source_url":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png","filename":"PRIF-Spotlight-12_26_grafik.png","filesize":35582,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/attachment"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/358"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16046"}],"wp:attached-to":[{"embeddable":true,"post_type":"post","id":16044,"href":"https:\/\/blog.prif.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}