The issue of arming Germany and the EU countries is currently dominating the headlines. The threat posed by Putin’s Russia and the uncertainty as to whether the USA under Trump will still stand by its security policy commitments within NATO have prompted the EU states to embark on a massive rearmament program. However, the EU Commission is currently setting the pace with the publication of the new White Paper and a series of defence industry programs. The discussion about the considerable arms expenditure obscures the focus on the fragmentation and competition among the European arms industry, the differences in threat analysis between the EU nation states, and the possible risks and problems of lowering the standards of German and European arms export policy.
Schlagwort: EU
Moving in the Rights’ Direction? An Assessment of the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime
Four years ago, on December 7, 2020, the European Union (EU) adopted its Global Human Rights Sanction Regime (EUGHRSR), which has been applauded as a milestone in the field of human rights promotion and protection. December 10, the UN’s global Human Rights Day, is a suitable occasion to put both the EUGHRSR and its performance to date to scrutiny.
The French Paradox: Risks to European Defence Harmonisation and Arms Export Control
In his speech on Europe on 25 April 2024, President E. Macron reiterated France’s commitment to building a credible European strategic autonomy. Indeed, the country has one of the most important technological and industrial defence bases in the European Union. However, its often very nationalistic view of the European Union seems to hinder the harmonisation of a common defence strategy and the establishment of a rigorous arms export control system that guarantees the application of international humanitarian law (IHL).
EU-wide Bans of Russian Media Outlets – More Than a Political Signal?
On May 17th, 2024, the European Council adopted a new package of EU sanctions directed against Russia, suspending the broadcasting activities of four major pro-Russian media outlets in Europe. Since the sanctioned platforms have been heavily involved in the spread of disinformation surrounding Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the ban of these outlets seems like an obvious and necessary step. However, given how easily Russian actors have been able to circumvent the blocking of media outlets, the question arises as to how effective the sanctions actually are.
A Gap between Social and Ecological Rights: A Commentary after One Year of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act
Frequent violations of human, labor, and environmental rights continue to impact supply chains globally, with notable prevalence in the Global South, but also in the Global North. The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (SCDDA, in German: Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz [LkSG]), enacted in 2023, represents significant progress in upholding rights within the context of socio-ecological transformation across value chains. However, the law faces challenges, particularly in terms of its prospective enforcement and the absence of a cohesive link between social and ecological rights. This article provides a commentary and argues that addressing these issues should be a priority.
The EU and the Israel-Palestine Test
Although the US has often prided itself of the status of sole interlocutor in the Middle East “conflict”, it has equally gained the reputation of an interested and biased mediator. In parallel, the European Community or EC – now European Union, EU – claimed to have a ‚more balanced’ approach on the Middle East file, which in turn garnered Palestinians’ trust. But during the current escalation, the EU has been woefully disunited. This blog argues that a more unified European voice can only come about by “walking the talk” of an Israel-Palestine policy/peace agreement based on purported basic European values.
EU Democracy Support in the Southern Neighborhood: How the EU Contradicts its own Practices
For decades, the EU has declared that it aims to support democratization in its southern neighborhood. Yet, the EU’s cooperation with repressive rulers in other policy fields, such as energy, migration, security, and trade, contradicts the EU’s own democracy support objectives. European policymakers have apparently not learnt from the pre-2011 period. As we argue in our project SHAPEDEM-EU, the EU must embark on a journey of un-, de- and re-learning, and it must avoid contradicting practices in different policy fields. This can be done by introducing a democracy learning loop.
Debating Foreign Interference in a Multipolar World: Is the EU Becoming Illiberal?
The ways in which foreign interference by China, Russia and others are currently discussed in Brussels indicate that the EU is considering moving away from liberal principles in the area of international civil society support and the foreign funding of NGOs in particular. Based on a co-authored comment in the Heidelberg Journal of International Law, this blog post argues that it is helpful to read the current EU debate on foreign interference in the light of the ongoing, conflict-ridden transformation of the global order.
Weltraum in der Nationalen Sicherheitsstrategie
Die Bundesregierung hat am 12. Juni 2023 nach langen Diskussionen ihre Nationale Sicherheitsstrategie verabschiedet. Neben vielen anderen Themen wird darin auch der Weltraum als Gegenstand deutscher Sicherheitspolitik diskutiert. „Die freie und ungehinderte Nutzung des Weltraums ist für unsere Sicherheit unverzichtbar“ (S. 16), heißt es dort. Was folgt daraus für die deutsche Sicherheitspolitik?
Harmonisierung um jeden Preis
Am heutigen Internationalen Flüchtlingstag ist die Situation für Geflüchtete so düster wie wohl seit Einführung des Gedenktages im Jahr 2001 noch nie. Während 2022 mehr als 100 Millionen Menschen auf der Flucht waren, lassen sich weltweit, insbesondere im Globalen Norden, Bestrebungen zur Aushöhlung des Flüchtlingsrechts beobachten. Die EU plant eine umfassende Reform des europäischen Asylrechts, doch auch dieser wird keine Harmonisierung gelingen, da Kernprobleme des bisherigen Systems nicht angegangen werden. Menschenrechtliche und rechtsstaatliche Grundsätze werden zum Bauernopfer.
